Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: Iggy Pop's best-reviewed album here since Lust for Life (1977). 6 of 7 critics liked it, with Pitchfork the lone holdout at 69.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spill Magazine | 9.0/10 | 90 | “Iggy Pop Every Loser Gold Tooth Music/Atlantic Records Like a fine wine, Iggy Pop continues to age into a truly one-of-a-kind vintage. Despite decades of hard living, the original street…” | |
| musicOMHby John Murphy | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “This short, sharp blast of refreshing energy finds James Newell Osterberg Jr as compelling as ever” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “After jazz crooning, poetry and electronic experimentation, 75-year-old Pop goes back to his roots on his 19th solo album” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Erica Campbell | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “With his 19th studio album the Godfather of Punk resurrects the primal rock energy that started his career five decades ago” |
| PopMatters | 8/10 | 80 | “After more than 35 minutes of masterful music on Every Loser, does Iggy Pop seem to be a winner, a loser, or somewhere between the two? He is true to…” | |
| Slant | 4/5 | 80 | “Every Loser' proves that Iggy Pop not only has more to say, but continues to find exciting ways to say them.” | |
| Pitchfork | 6.9/10 | 69 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Iggy Pop
More Metal & Punk from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply