Critics give I Bet on Sky a B-Side Breakdown of 73 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 84.
The verdict on I Bet on Sky
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 84 Paste
- Lowest 60 Mojo, The Guardian and Alternative Press
- Career #9 of Dinosaur Jr.'s 12 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Jeff Gonick | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2012 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Thom Gibbs | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “What happens to reformed bands that overstay their initial nostalgia-driven welcome? It’s rare for them to make notable new music, and it’s even rarer for their third album since reuniting…” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby J.R. Moores | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “Some listeners may lament this retreat from the hefty barrage of sound that was 2009’s Farm, but it is crucial that a band such as Dinosaur Jr prog…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brandon Stosuy | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2012 | “If you were a Dinosaur Jr. fan the first time around, it still seems amazing, three albums into their post-2005 reunion run, they're together at all. But at this point,…” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | “J Mascis doesn't so much sing on this album as lie in the gutter and murmur through a pile of dead leaves and gravel, writes Maddy Costa” |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
I Bet on Sky in Dinosaur Jr.'s catalog
How these critics usually treat Dinosaur Jr.
- Mojo Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Dinosaur Jr.'s other albums (4).
- Uncut Harsher than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Dinosaur Jr.'s other albums (5).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual7 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Dinosaur Jr.'s other albums (9).
- Paste About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Dinosaur Jr.'s other albums (4).
- NME About usual for them8 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Dinosaur Jr.'s other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them8 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Dinosaur Jr.'s other albums (11).
More from Dinosaur Jr.
← Earlier Farm (2009)Later → Give a Glimpse of What Yer Not (2016)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply