Critics give Monomania a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Monomania
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Spin
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- Career #5 of Deerhunter's 6 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spin via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 9/10 | 90 | 2013 | “9SPIN Rating: 9 of 10Release Date: May 07, 2013Label: 4ADRock'n'roll still ain't noise pollution, but just about everything else is. For each advance in” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Chase Hutchinson | B+ | 88 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Grady Smith | B+ | 88 | 2013 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 8.3/10 | 83 | 2013 | “On Deerhunter’s swaggering fifth album, Monomania, they almost completely jettison the dreamy ambience that usually characterizes their work in favor of straight-up raw, bleeding garage rock, populating the songs with…” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Lucy Jones | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Stacey Anderson | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Monomania on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | “Now his band is on its sixth album, Bradford Cox gets to do what Bradford Cox wants – and we all have to get used to it, says Michael Hann” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Deerhunter
← Earlier Halcyon Digest (2010)Later → Fading Frontier (2015)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply