Critics give Fading Frontier a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: Deerhunter's best-reviewed album here since Halcyon Digest (2010). Scores ran from 60 (Q) to 100 (NME).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Barry Nicolson | 5/5 | 100 | 2015 | “Musically, there’s not much connective tissue between Deerhunter’s seventh album and its predecessor, 2013’s caustic, itchy-skinned ‘Monomania’, but they do have one important thing in common: both were inspired, or…” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Monica Castillo | A- | 91 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 9/10 | 90 | 2015 | “9SPIN Rating: 9 of 10Release Date: October 16, 2015Label: 4ADNear the outset of Deerhunter’s inspiring and surprisingly triumphant seventh album, Bradford” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2015 | “After the grotty, pissed-off Monomania and Bradford Cox's catastrophic car accident comes Deerhunter's most content, warm and plainspoken work to date. While the band's written many indelible songs, Fading Frontier…” |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Stevie Chick | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “The Deerhunter mastermind’s latest musical whims take the band into more straightforward pop territory – but there’s still a deep disquiet to it all” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Fading Frontier on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Deerhunter
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply