New Bermuda

Deafheaven – New Bermuda: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for New Bermuda by Deafheaven
Released October 2, 2015
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Deafheaven

New Bermuda

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 10 critics · 80% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval80%8 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.

By the numbers: The third best-reviewed Metal & Punk album of 2015 we've tracked.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 60Uncut: 70Exclaim!: 80The Guardian: 80Kerrang!: 80AllMusic: 80Spin: 90Pitchfork: 90The A.V. Club: 91Consequence: 91 Breakdown 81
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Danette Chavez A- 91 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
Consequence via Wikipediaby Sean Barry A- 91 2015 “It's remarkable that the San Francisco group could turn on a dime like this.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Andy O'Connor 9/10 90 2015 “9 SPIN Rating: 9 of 10Release Date: October 02, 2015Label: ANTI- Deafheaven have been the subject of many bold proclamations, to the point where merely”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene 9.0/10 90 2015 “Showcasing a brilliant collision of beauty and despair, Deafheaven’s new album, New Bermuda, is even more overwhelming than their 2013 breakthrough, Sunbather. The group has shaped a suite of songs…”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Josiah Hughes 8/10 80 2015
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Lanre Bakare 4/5 80 2015 “Those who like the loud bits of Mogwai and the more melodic moments of Dillinger Escape Plan will have found the metal band for them.”
Kerrang! via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2015
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Uncut via Wikipedia 7/10 70 2015
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow 3/5 60 2015 “Check out our album review of Artist's New Bermuda on Rolling Stone.com.”

More from Deafheaven

See all Deafheaven albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2015

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply