Critics give The Big Dream a B-Side Breakdown of 69 (D+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 82.
The verdict on The Big Dream
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 9 liked it.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Robert Ham | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2013 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Aaron Payne | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “David Lynch is described by his record label as a ‘multimedia artist’, which is fitting in so far as it’s accurate but doesn’t really do him justice.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul MacInnes | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “David Lynch's singing career seems to be sauntering towards the mainstream, writes Paul MacInnes” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Phil Hebblethwaite | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “If the idea of a great visionary of cinema releasing an album in 2011 smacked of novelty, the fact that David Lynch has got another one together 18 months later…” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Matthew Slaughter | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “The Big Dream is as warped and wondrous a vision as David Lynch has produced in recent times.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 6.3/10 | 63 | 2013 | “The film director's second full-length solo album continues with the smokey blues mood and creepy atmosphere of 2011's Crazy Clown Time. A digital bonus track features guest vocals from Lykke…” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Paula Mejia | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | “Warped blues wanderings from cult film's favorite weirdo.” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jesse Cataldo | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2013 | “The Big Dream is briefly amusing, consistently strange, but rarely resonant.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from David Lynch
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply