Critics give Sky Trails a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.
The verdict on Sky Trails
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 Q, Record Collector, Mojo and 3 more
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone
- Career #3 of David Crosby's 5 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Having put his solo career on the back burner for 20 years, Sky Trails is Crosby’s third album since 2014 – not a bad work rate for a man who,…” |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Mat Snow | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Barney Harsent | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “David Crosby might be entering life’s twilight but, like a tired drummer, he seems to be speeding up towards the end. Perhaps he’s simply hit a rich vein of form…” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Rob Hughes | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Redoubtable former Byrd still soaring high” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Timothy Monger | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Ian Rushbury | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 | “The free love generation’s favourite curmudgeon, the redoubtable David Crosby, follows up last years Lighthouse album with Sky Trails. Age doesn’t seem to be” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Richard Gehr | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Our take on the sixth solo album from the CSNY veteran.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from David Crosby
← Earlier Lighthouse (2016)Later → Here If You Listen (2018)
More Rock from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply