Crack-Up

Fleet Foxes – Crack-Up: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Crack-Up by Fleet Foxes
Released June 16, 2017
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Fleet Foxes

Crack-Up

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 8 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval75%6 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 88.

By the numbers: The lowest score of Fleet Foxes's 5 albums with a Breakdown.

020406080100The Guardian: 60Rolling Stone: 70The A.V. Club: 78NME: 80The Independent: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 87Entertainment Weekly: 88 Breakdown 78
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein B+ 88
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 8.7/10 87 2017 “The band’s third album is their most complex and compelling to date. Robin Pecknold’s songwriting retreats inward while around him dense folk compositions rise and fall on a massive scale.”
NME via Wikipediaby Larry Bartleet 4/5 80 2017 “After a six-year hiatus, Seattle folk-rock institution Fleet Foxes are back with a profoundly ambitious third album”
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 4/5 80 2017
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Timothy Monger 4/5 80
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Nina Corcoran C+ 78 2017
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan 3.5/5 70 2017 “Out take on the latest from the coffee-shop heroes, returning from a six-year hiatus.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 3/5 60 2017 “The band’s third album is alternately intriguing and irritating, garlanded with wonderful orchestrations, gorgeous melodies … and their trademark pretensions”

From B-Side Guys

More from Fleet Foxes

See all Fleet Foxes albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2017

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply