Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 88.
By the numbers: Courtney Barnett's best-reviewed album here since Sometimes I Sit and Think, and Sometimes I Just Sit (2015).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2018 | “Don’t say Courtney Barnett didn’t warn you. “Put me on a pedestal and I’ll only disappoint you,” she sang on her acclaimed 2015 debut album, words that were often interpreted…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Indie-rock singer-songwriter Courtney Barnett mixes penetrating observation, wry humor and deep empathy on a modest masterpiece of an LP” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Chris Catchpole | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Dannii Leivers | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Derek Robertson | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Courtney Barnett uses her garage rock to explore anxiety and depression, Slow Club’s Charles Watson heads to Spacebomb Studios for his first solo record, while Parquet Courts release their best…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexandra Pollard | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Barnett’s second album is angrier, gathering her arrows to skewer the world’s problems like a loud battle cry” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | C | 75 | 2018 | “Courtney Barnett lacks the energy to Tell Me How You Really Feel” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2018 | “Courtney Barnett’s second album is smaller, more introverted than her debut. It’s tentative but with a purpose, songs about what it means to not have—or need—the right words for everything.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3/5 | 60 | 2018 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Courtney Barnett
More Indie & Alternative from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply