Early reviews. Critics give Me Oh My an early B-Side Breakdown of 67 (Mixed Bag), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Me Oh My
4 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 8/10 | 80 | 2009 | “Don’t let those vintage dresses and heavy false eyelashes fool you. [a]Cate Le Bon[/a] is one strange creature. Her odd, beautiful songs burrow like furtive woodland creatures to a safe…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 7.3/10 | 73 | 2010 | “First released on Gruff Rhys' label, the debut from this Cardiff singer/songwriter buries the pop hooks and lets her freak-folk flag fly.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| DIYby Lucy Tesco | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2009 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | “The debut release on Gruff Rhys's Irony Bored label, Me Oh My shows Welsh singer-songwriter Cate Le Bon to be a strikingly different prospect to the recent run of new…” |
| musicOMHby John Murphy | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2009 | “Cate Le Bon is not, if you were expecting a continuation of the recent phenomenon of celebrity offspring, the progeny of Simon and Yasmin. Instead, the” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Me Oh My in Cate Le Bon's catalog
How these critics usually treat Cate Le Bon
- musicOMH Harsher than usual21 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Cate Le Bon's other albums (4).
- DIY About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Cate Le Bon's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for them7 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Cate Le Bon's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Cate Le Bon's other albums (4).
More from Cate Le Bon
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply