Critics give Down in the Weeds, Where the World Once Was a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on Down in the Weeds, Where the World Once Was
7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 60 Exclaim!
- Career #4 of Bright Eyes's 9 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Bright Eyes's best-reviewed album here since Cassadaga (2007).
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Randall Colburn | A- | 91 | 2020 |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Bud Scoppa | 9/10 | 90 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Andy Crump | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2020 |
| Q via Wikipediaby Tom Doyle | 4/5 | 80 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Elisa Bray | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2020 |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2020 |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Alex Hudson | 6/10 | 60 | 2020 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Down in the Weeds, Where the World Once Was in Bright Eyes's catalog
How these critics usually treat Bright Eyes
- Q About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Bright Eyes's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Bright Eyes's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Bright Eyes's other albums (7).
- AllMusic About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Bright Eyes's other albums (8).
- NME About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Bright Eyes's other albums (7).
More from Bright Eyes
← Earlier The People’s Key (2011)Later → Five Dice, All Threes (2024)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2020
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply