Akuma no Uta

Boris – Akuma no Uta: B-Side Breakdown 87 (B+) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Akuma no Uta by Boris
Released June 6, 2003
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Boris

Akuma no Uta

87
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 3 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown87Grade: B+
Approval100%3 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Akuma no Uta an early B-Side Breakdown of 87 (B+), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Akuma no Uta

So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 82Mojo: 100 Breakdown 87
Mojo via Wikipediaby Andrew Male 5/5 100 2007
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zach Baron 8.2/10 82 2005
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80

Akuma no Uta in Boris's catalog

75Akuma no Uta (2003): 8787This oneBoris at Last -Feedbacker- (2003): 8989Sun Baked Snow Cave (2005): 6464Pink (2005): 8080Rainbow (2006): 8181New Album (2011): 7777Heavy Rocks (2011): 7575Noise (2014): 8181Dear (2017): 7676W (2022): 77772022
Boris's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Boris album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Boris

  • AllMusic Harsher than usual11 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Boris's other albums (8).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them8 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Boris's other albums (7).

More from Boris

See all Boris albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2003

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply