Critics give The North Borders a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Bonobo's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Black Sands (69).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clash via Wikipediaby David Aaron | 9/10 | 90 | 2013 | “ClashMusic: Read an album review of 'The North Borders' by Bonobo (Simon Green) featuring guest Erykah Badu. Released on Ninja Tune on 1st April 2013.” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ruth Follows | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “The beauty of Bonobo’s material lies in its ability to translate emotion into a music score, regardless of instrument, tempo, lyrics, or influencing” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Derek Staples | C+ | 78 | 2013 | “A formidable follow up to 2010's Black Sands.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Ashley Hampson | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Kat Waplington | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “The North Borders is as ambitious a record as its predecessor, and it’s just as successful.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Benjamin Aspray | 6/10 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Bonobo
More Electronic from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply