Critics give Frank Black Francis a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 88.
The verdict on Frank Black Francis
Most critics liked it: 6 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 88 Entertainment Weekly
- Outlier 40 Q, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of Black Francis's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Black Francis's best-reviewed album here since Teenager of the Year (1994).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Marc Weingarten | B+ | 88 | 2004 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Lianne Steinberg | 8/10 | 80 | 2004 | “There’s something about hearing little Charles Michael Kittridge Thomson IV’s voice and acoustic guitar blasting into a tape recorder. Recorded in…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joe Tangari | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2004 | “The former/current Pixies frontman creates a prequel– and sequel– to his famous band's work. On the first disc of this two-disc set, Black unearths pre-Pixies demos; on the second, he…” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2006 | |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin | 3/5 | 60 | 2006 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 2/5 | 40 | 2006 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Black Francis
← Earlier The Cult of Ray (1996)Later → Fast Man Raider Man (2006)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply