Fast Man Raider Man

Black Francis – Fast Man Raider Man: B-Side Breakdown 62 (D-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Fast Man Raider Man by Black Francis
Released June 19, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Black Francis

Fast Man Raider Man

62
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 10 critics · 20% approval
B-Side Breakdown62Grade: D-
Approval20%2 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 30 points of each other

Critics give Fast Man Raider Man a B-Side Breakdown of 62 (D-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 30 to 81.

The verdict on Fast Man Raider Man

Critics split on this one: 2 of 10 liked it.

020406080100Uncut: 30PopMatters: 50NME: 50The Guardian: 60Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 60Pitchfork: 64Mojo: 70AllMusic: 70Alternative Press: 80Entertainment Weekly: 81 Breakdown 62
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Will Hermes B- 81 2006
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2006
Mojo via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joe Tangari 6.4/10 64 2006 “As he did on 2005's Honeycomb, the Pixies leader works with an all-star team of studio musicians to craft sepia-toned visions of Americana and Stax/Volt 45s.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dorian Lynskey 3/5 60 2006
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 3/5 60 2006
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Ed Huyck 5/10 50 2006
NME via Wikipedia 5/10 50 2006
Uncut via Wikipedia 1.5/5 30 2006

More from Black Francis

See all Black Francis albums ranked

More Rock from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply