Early reviews. Critics give Bette of Roses an early B-Side Breakdown of 58 (F), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Bette of Roses
So far, 1 of 4 critics liked it.
- Highest 80 AllMusic
- Lowest 38 Los Angeles Times
- Career #5 of Bette Midler's 6 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Marc Coleman | 3/5 | 60 | 2006 | |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | Dud | 55 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Jean Rosenbluth | 1.5/4 | 38 | 1995 | “One so wants to like everything the Divine Miss M does.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Bette of Roses in Bette Midler's catalog
How these critics usually treat Bette Midler
- Robert Christgau Harsher than usual4 points below the other critics here. Usually 22 points above on Bette Midler's other albums (3).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Kinder than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 17 points below on Bette Midler's other albums (5).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual29 points above the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Bette Midler's other albums (5).
More from Bette Midler
More Electronic from around 1995
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply