Early reviews. Critics give Sugaring Season an early B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Sugaring Season
3 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 85 Paste
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone
- Career #6 of Beth Orton's 7 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Douglas Heselgrave | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2012 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | C+ | 78 | 2012 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Keefe | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Sugaring Season features some of the strongest songs of Orton’s career.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby J.R Moores | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | “On Sugaring Season Beth Orton captures both the melancholy and the confidence that comes with growing older really rather well.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Sugaring Season in Beth Orton's catalog
How these critics usually treat Beth Orton
- Rolling Stone Harsher than usual17 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Beth Orton's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them7 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Beth Orton's other albums (6).
- Slant About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Beth Orton's other albums (3).
More from Beth Orton
← Earlier Comfort of Strangers (2006)Later → Kidsticks (2016)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply