Critics give Girls in Peacetime Want To Dance a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on Girls in Peacetime Want To Dance
6 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone
- Career #6 of Belle and Sebastian's 11 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Belle and Sebastian's best-reviewed album here since The Life Pursuit (2006).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson | A- | 91 | 2015 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Saloni Gajjar | B+ | 88 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Kevin Harley | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Re-energised elasticity accommodates a full flush of collective colours” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Harriet Gibsone | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Belle and Sebastian’s ninth album takes in ambience, balladry and Eurovision romps, and does it with skill and wit, writes Harriet Gibsone” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randall Roberts | 3/4 | 75 | 2015 | “Winter semester is upon us, and it makes a certain amount of sense that Portland, Ore., folk rock band the Decemberists and Scottish folk-rock-disco balladeers Belle & Sebastian would issue…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Rachel Brodsky | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: January 20, 2015Label: Matador"Nobody writes them like they used to / So it may as well be me," Stuart Murdoch sang on” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Dan Stubbs | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jeremy Gordon | 6.6/10 | 66 | 2015 | “On Belle and Sebastian's first album in five years, the band has introduced a new wrinkle, writing a record filled with synthesizers and dance grooves to coax their once notoriously-staid…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Amy Rose Spiegel | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Girls in Peacetime Want to Dance on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Girls in Peacetime Want To Dance in Belle and Sebastian's catalog
How these critics usually treat Belle and Sebastian
- The Guardian Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Belle and Sebastian's other albums (8).
- NME Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Belle and Sebastian's other albums (8).
- Spin Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Belle and Sebastian's other albums (6).
- Entertainment Weekly Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Belle and Sebastian's other albums (5).
- Pitchfork About usual for them11 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Belle and Sebastian's other albums (10).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them18 points below the other critics here. Usually 15 points below on Belle and Sebastian's other albums (7).
More from Belle and Sebastian
← Earlier Belle and Sebastian Write About Love (2010)Later → Days of the Bagnold Summer (2019)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply