Being Funny in a Foreign Language

The 1975 – Being Funny in a Foreign Language: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for Being Funny in a Foreign Language by The 1975
Released October 14, 2022
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The 1975

Being Funny in a Foreign Language

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 5 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval100%5 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 5 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of The 1975's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of A Brief Inquiry Into Online Relationships (83). The sixth best-reviewed album of 2022 we've tracked.

020406080100NME: 80Pitchfork: 80Clash: 80AllMusic: 80Dork: 100 Breakdown 84
The gist
Dork via Wikipediaby Stephen Ackroyd 5/5 100 2022 “Being Funny In A Foreign Language by The 1975 · released 14th October 2022 · via Dirty Hit · 16 tracks · album profile · plus 20 related Dork coverage…”
NME via Wikipediaby El Hunt 4/5 80 2022 “After an experimental phase, the band’s fifth album is succinct, cuttingly self-aware, and boasts some of their most-direct pop hits in years”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brady Brickner-Wood 8.0/10 80 2022
Clash via Wikipediaby James Mellen 8/10 80 2022 “It’s fair to say The 1975 are one of music’s most divisive groups; the lovers really love; the haters really hate. Since 2012 the quartet,”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar 4/5 80

More from The 1975

See all The 1975 albums ranked

More Pop from around 2022

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply