Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Beach House's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Teen Dream (81). Scores ran from 60 (The Guardian) to 100 (AllMusic).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Lindsay Zoladz | 9.1/10 | 91 | 2012 | “Two years ago, Teen Dream felt like such a complete realization of Beach House's potential that it had to make you wonder where they could possibly go from there. By…” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Zack Kotzer | A- | 91 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Alex Young | A- | 91 | 2012 | “Anticipatory ache doesnt lead into the chorus; it is the chorus” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Mike Powell | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: May 15, 2012Label: Sub PopThe most important instrument on Beach House's fourth album is the drum kit. Not Alex” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Bloom on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rebecca Schiller | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | “On their last album, ‘Teen Dream’, Beach House managed the transition to indie-darling status with uncommon grace. Abandoning the music-box murk of their first two records, the Baltimore dream-poppers used…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Beach House
More Indie & Alternative from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply