Gloss Drop

Battles – Gloss Drop: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Gloss Drop by Battles
Released June 5, 2011
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Battles

Gloss Drop

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 8 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval75%6 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Critics give Gloss Drop a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on Gloss Drop

6 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

020406080100The Guardian: 60Pitchfork: 74NME: 80AllMusic: 80The A.V. Club: 85Entertainment Weekly: 88Chicago Tribune: 88Spin: 90 Breakdown 81
The gist
Spin via Wikipediaby Stacey Anderson 9/10 90 2011 “The second album by these New York math-rockers embraces a dubious formula: subtract exceptional avant-garde guitarist Tyondai Braxton, add…Gary Numan?”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson B+ 88 2011
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Ryan P. C. Trimble 3.5/4 88 Oct 30, 2026
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Kenny Herzog B 85 2011
NME via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison 8/10 80 2011 “Knocking around on the internet, there’s pictures of Bill Gates taken in 1983 of him stretched out on a desk, wearing a chunky woollen sweater and loveably tousled fringe. His…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jess Harvell 7.4/10 74 2011 “Tyondai Braxton and his distinct vocals have moved on, but Battles remain committed to making complex pop-prog sound like fun. Gary Numan guests.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dorian Lynskey 3/5 60 2011 “Without ex-singer Tyondai Braxton, Battles take us on a bumpier though still impressive ride, writes Dorian Lynskey”

More from Battles

See all Battles albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2011

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply