Critics give Oversteps a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Oversteps
5 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 PopMatters and Drowned in Sound
- Lowest 60 Q and Uncut
- Career #5 of Autechre's 10 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Mike Schiller | 9/10 | 90 | 2010 | “The first thing you must know about Oversteps, the latest in Autechre's apparently neverending stream of album releases: its second track, "ilanders", is the” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Paul Clarke | 9/10 | 90 | 2010 | “If you wanted to name an Autechre album as the perfect introduction to someone who doesn’t otherwise ‘get’ them then, after nine albums in 17 years…” |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipediaby B Mcghee | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “Rob Brown, one half of duo Autechre, was an architect by training, which perhaps goes some way in explaining the highly stylised, hyper-structural awareness that underpins their electronica. In their…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Bush | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Patrick Sisson | 7.2/10 | 72 | 2010 | “Warp mainstays and techno pioneers pivot slightly with an album of dark ambience and intriguing textures.” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Jude Clarke | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2010 | “Autechre are an endlessly evolving outfit. Since their 1987 inception, as pioneers of what came to be known as IDM or "intelligent dance music", Rob Brown” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Autechre
More Electronic from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply