Ategnatos

Eluveitie – Ategnatos: B-Side Breakdown 83 (B) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for Ategnatos by Eluveitie
Released April 5, 2019
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Eluveitie

Ategnatos

83
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 4 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown83Grade: B
Approval100%4 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 6 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 4 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Eluveitie's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Helvetios (77). All 4 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 79, from Louder.

020406080100Louder: 79Distorted Sound: 80Dead Rhetoric: 85Sonic Perspectives: 86 Breakdown 83
The gist
Sonic Perspectivesby Jonathan Smith 8.6/10 86 2019 “Celtic lore and mighty mountain heights. Over the past couple decades there has been a fair degree of tribute paid to Celtic culture among various folk metal outfits. From the…”
Dead Rhetoric 8.5/10 85 2019
Distorted Soundby Fraser Wilson 8/10 80 2019 “Fraser Wilson reviews the brand new album from folk metal legends Eluveitie. Read his review of Ategnatos here on Distorted Sound!”
Louder via Wikipediaby Sebastian Kessler 5.5/7 79 2019

More from Eluveitie

See all Eluveitie albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2019

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply