Ashes Against the Grain

Agalloch – Ashes Against the Grain: B-Side Breakdown 92 (A-) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for Ashes Against the Grain by Agalloch
Released August 8, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Agalloch

Ashes Against the Grain

92 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 5 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown92Grade: A-
Approval100%5 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

An early A-Side. It earned the badge from its first 5 reviews. More outlets are still weighing in, and if their scores pull it below the line, the badge comes off.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of 2006 we've tracked. The best-reviewed album of Agalloch's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of The Serpent & the Sphere (77).

020406080100Pitchfork: 80Stylus Magazine: 88PopMatters: 90Sputnikmusic: 100AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 92
The gist
Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia 5/5 100
AllMusic via Wikipedia 5/5 100
PopMatters via Wikipedia 9/10 90 2006 “Black metal might have begun as a largely Scandinavian phenomenon during the early-1990s, but as of late, American bands have started producing a good deal of”
Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Cosmo Lee B+ 88
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brandon Stosuy 8.0/10 80 2006 “Oregon metal band's latest record is their hugest, most artful collection to date.”

More from Agalloch

See all Agalloch albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply