Early reviews. Critics give The Serpent & the Sphere an early B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Sputnikmusic) to 100 (Exclaim!). Agalloch's best-reviewed album here since Marrow of the Spirit (2010).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Natalie Walschots | 10/10 | 100 | ||
| Louder via Wikipediaby Robert Müller | 6/7 | 86 | 2014 | “Ich denke, Agalloch bedürfen keiner Vorstellung mehr. Neo-Folk trifft Doom und Black Metal sowie lyrisch-dunkle Romantik. Ambient und Raserei spannen den” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Grayson Haver Currin | 8.3/10 | 83 | 2014 | “For a band that’s spent the last 15 years gracefully and aggressively testing the limits of the sound of heavy metal, Portland’s Agalloch have committed very few errors. Their fifth…” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Joe Sweeney | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “Agalloch’s fifth album, The Serpent & the Sphere, is an entrancing, inter-dimensional construction zone.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Kim Kelly | 8/10 | 80 | 2014 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: May 13, 2014Label: Profound LoreAgalloch are one of the best bands in modern metal. This isn't a question; it's a fact,” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby James Christopher Monger | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Kyle Ward | 2/5 | 40 | “Agalloch – The Serpent and the Sphere review: Planting a seed of doubt” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Agalloch
More Metal & Punk from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply