Early reviews. Critics give To the Teeth an early B-Side Breakdown of 65 (D), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on To the Teeth
Most critics weren't won over: 1 of 7 liked it.
- Highest 80 Alternative Press
- Lowest 60 Slant, Rolling Stone, Q and AllMusic
- Career #16 of Ani DiFranco's 19 albums with a Breakdown
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Spin via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2004 |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Steve Hochman | 2.5/4 | 63 | 1999 |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 3/5 | 60 | 2001 |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby William Ruhlmann | 3/5 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
To the Teeth in Ani DiFranco's catalog
How these critics usually treat Ani DiFranco
- Spin Kinder than usual6 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on Ani DiFranco's other albums (4).
- Los Angeles Times Harsher than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 13 points above on Ani DiFranco's other albums (5).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 13 points below on Ani DiFranco's other albums (8).
- Slant About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Ani DiFranco's other albums (14).
- AllMusic About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Ani DiFranco's other albums (18).
More from Ani DiFranco
← Earlier Fellow Workers (1999)Later → Educated Guess (2003)
More Indie & Alternative from around 1999
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply