Early reviews. Critics give Malibu an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Malibu
5 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 100 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Anderson .Paak's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Ventura (80).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Michael Madden | A- | 91 | 2016 | “California native Anderson. Paak offers a radiant blend of styles and a joyful breakout album in Malibu.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson | B+ | 88 | 2016 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marcus J. Moore | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2016 | “The West Coast-based rapper and singer/songwriter Anderson .Paak showed up frequently on Dr. Dre’s Compton. His third album, his most assured and most personal project yet, is informed by voices…” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Steve Yates | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Sheldon Pearce | 7/10 | 70 | 2016 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: January 15, 2016Label: EMPIRE / OBE / Steel Wool / Art ClubTime has always been of the essence for Brandon Paak” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Malibu on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Anderson .Paak
More R&B & Soul from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply