Early reviews. Critics give Child Ballads an early B-Side Breakdown of 70 (C-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Child Ballads
Most critics liked it: 3 of 6 liked it.
- Highest 80 Uncut, PopMatters and The Independent
- Outlier 40 The Guardian, 30 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The lowest score of Anaïs Mitchell's 4 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Steve Horowitz | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rachael Maddux | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “Child Ballads is a deceptively wispy collection of old English and Scottish folk songs, a collaboration sprouted a few years ago when Mitchell and Hamer discovered their shared fascination with…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Steve Leggett | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Jude Rogers | 2/5 | 40 | 2013 | “Francis Child's timeless collection of folk ballads gets a rather too pretty and over-produced new interpretation here, writes Jude Rogers” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Child Ballads in Anaïs Mitchell's catalog
How these critics usually treat Anaïs Mitchell
- The Guardian Harsher than usual36 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Anaïs Mitchell's other albums (3).
- Uncut Kinder than usual12 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Anaïs Mitchell's other albums (3).
More from Anaïs Mitchell
← Earlier Young Man in America (2012)Later → Anaïs Mitchell (2022)
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply