All Shook Down

The Replacements – All Shook Down: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for All Shook Down by The Replacements
Released September 1990
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Replacements

All Shook Down

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 9 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval67%6 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.

By the numbers: The Replacements's best-reviewed album here since Pleased to Meet Me (1987). Scores ran from 40 (NME) to 90 (AllMusic).

020406080100NME: 40Q: 60Los Angeles Times: 70Chicago Tribune: 75Select: 80Rolling Stone: 80Entertainment Weekly in 1990: 81Entertainment Weekly in 2008: 85AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 73
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4.5/5 90
Entertainment Weekly in 2008 via Wikipediaby Chris Willman B 85 2008
Entertainment Weekly in 1990 via Wikipediaby Ira Robbins B- 81 1990
Select via Wikipediaby Graham Linehan 4/5 80 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Chris Mundy 4/5 80 1990 “Check out our album review of Artist's All Shook Down on Rolling Stone.com.”
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 3/4 75 1990 “Replacements All Shook Down (Reprise/Sire) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR) After last year`s relatively slick ”Don`t Tell a Soul” turned into their best-selling album, the Minneapolis quartet returns to the shaggy-dog sound of old…”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Richard Cromelin 3.5/5 70 1990 “In which Paul Westerberg completes the progression from unruly rocker with a tender heart to tender-hearted tunesmith given to rock spasms.”
Q via Wikipediaby Martin Aston 3/5 60 2005
NME via Wikipediaby Steve Lamacq 4/10 40 2005

More from The Replacements

See all The Replacements albums ranked

More Rock from around 1990

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply