Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.
By the numbers: Calexico's best-reviewed album here since Carried to Dust (2008). Scores ran from 50 (Consequence) to 91 (The A.V. Club).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipedia | A- | 91 | ||
| Spectrum Cultureby Eric Dennis | 4.0/5 | 80 | 2012 | “[xrr rating=4.0/5]Setting aside Circo, a tour-only CD that was initially available at the band’s live shows but has since been issued on vinyl, Algiers marks Calexico’s first proper album in…” |
| musicOMHby Christopher Monk | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “Calexico are often labelled – or even dismissed – as mere stylists. It’s easy to see why: across their six-album career, the band have toyed with country,” |
| The Independent via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “A new city inspires new sounds for US roots-rockers” | |
| Beats Per Minuteby Rob Hakimian | 76% | 76 | 2012 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 7.5/10 | 75 | “The Tucson duo traveled to New Orleans to record its latest album, named for a neighborhood on the southwest banks of the Mississippi River, home to krewe dens, Catholic churches,…” | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipedia | 2.5/5 | 50 | “Plenty to enjoy, just not enough to truly appreciate.” |
More from Calexico
More Indie & Alternative from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply