No consensus yet. 2 critics have reviewed Good Weather for Immaculate Conception so far, for an early score of 70 (C-): Riff Magazine gives it 8/10 (80) and Slant gives it 3/5 (60). The B-Side Breakdown appears at 3 reviews.
Alanis Morissette's track record
Their last three Breakdowns: Havoc and Bright Lights 53, Such Pretty Forks in the Road 76, The Storm Before the Calm 65. Their best reviewed is still Supposed Former Infatuation Junkie 81.
Critics who usually review Alanis Morissette
- AllMusic8 of 9 albums · average 71 · usually 6 points above the other critics
- Rolling Stone7 of 9 albums · average 59 · usually 7 points below the other critics
- Entertainment Weekly6 of 9 albums · average 83 · usually 17 points above the other critics
- NME6 of 9 albums · average 40 · usually 30 points below the other critics
- Slant60 for this one6 of 9 albums · average 60 · usually 4 points below the other critics
- Blender4 of 9 albums · average 60 · usually 1 point below the other critics
- Los Angeles Times4 of 9 albums · average 82 · usually 9 points above the other critics
- PopMatters4 of 9 albums · average 55 · usually 5 points below the other critics
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riff Magazineby Vera Maksymiuk | 8/10 | 80 | Nov 3, 2026 | “Acoustic arrangements, gospel influences, layered harmonies and powerful vocals distinguish Alanis Morissette's holiday collection.” |
| Slantby Sal Cinquemani | 3/5 | 60 | Nov 4, 2026 | “The singer-songwriter attempts to lend her idiosyncrasies to mostly conventional fare.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Alanis Morissette
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply