A Better Tomorrow

Wu-Tang Clan – A Better Tomorrow: B-Side Breakdown 65 (D) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for A Better Tomorrow by Wu-Tang Clan
Released December 2, 2014
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Wu-Tang Clan

A Better Tomorrow

65
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 9 critics · 22% approval
B-Side Breakdown65Grade: D
Approval22%2 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 80.

By the numbers: The lowest score of Wu-Tang Clan's 8 albums with a Breakdown.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 50Pitchfork: 59Slant: 60Spin: 60The Guardian: 60The A.V. Club: 65NME: 70The Independent: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 65
The gist
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 4/5 80 2014
AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries 4/5 80
NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly 7/10 70 2014
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Tim Grierson D 65 2022
Slant via Wikipediaby Jesse Cataldo 3/5 60 2014 “The Wu-Tang Clan struggles to present a unified front on what’s purportedly the clan’s last official album.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Martin Douglas 6/10 60 2014 “6SPIN Rating: 6 of 10Release Date: December 02, 2014Label: Warner Bros. It's tempting to treat what is being rumored to be the final Wu-Tang Clan album”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul MacInnes 3/5 60 2014
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Craig Jenkins 5.9/10 59 2014
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten 2.5/5 50 2014 “Check out our album review of Artist's A Better Tomorrow on Rolling Stone.com.”

More from Wu-Tang Clan

See all Wu-Tang Clan albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2014

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply