Yung Rich Nation

Migos – Yung Rich Nation: B-Side Breakdown 68 (D+) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Yung Rich Nation by Migos
Released July 31, 2015
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Migos

Yung Rich Nation

68
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 7 critics · 14% approval
B-Side Breakdown68Grade: D+
Approval14%1 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Only one of 7 critics liked it: Consequence, at 85. The lowest score of Migos's 4 albums with a Breakdown.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 60Exclaim!: 60The Guardian: 60Spin: 70HipHopDX: 70Pitchfork: 70Consequence: 85 Breakdown 68
The gist
Consequence via Wikipediaby Pat Levy B 85 2015 “The Atlanta rappers finally go legit.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Rebecca Haithcoat 7/10 70 2015 “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: July 26, 2015Label: 300 / Quality Control / Atlantic“Trap Funk,” one of the last songs on Migos’ long-awaited proper”
HipHopDX via Wikipediaby Garrett Ural 3.5/5 70 “Get your hip hop album reviews, rap and R&B reviews from the best music review website on the web. We have all the latest music reviews from today’s top artists.”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Craig Jenkins 7.0/10 70 2015 “The rhyme skills and lurid way with imagery that first brought the Atlanta rap trio Migos to national attention remain on display throughout Yung Rich Nation, their major-label debut. It…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten 3/5 60 2015 “Check out our album review of Artist's Yung Rich Nation on Rolling Stone.com.”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Calum Slingerland 6/10 60 2015
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 3/5 60 2015 “The Fab Three’s debut LP proper feels more like a victory lap rather than a great leap forward – but it’s still a witty and entertaining listen”

More from Migos

See all Migos albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2015

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply