Critics give You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love a B-Side Breakdown of 85 (B), from 18 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.
The verdict on You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love
17 of 18 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 The Independent and DIY
- Lowest 70 Exclaim!
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Olivia Rodrigo's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Guts (84). The fourth best-reviewed album of 2026 we've tracked so far.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 5/5 | 100 | Jun 12, 2026 | “US artist scatters warning signs through the first side of the album in a way that feels pre-emptive, like she should have seen them all along” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Daisy Carter | 5/5 | 100 | Jun 12, 2026 | “An accessible yet hugely intelligent album that ushers her into her rightful position as one of her generation’s best artists.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Alex Rigotti | 4.5/5 | 90 | Jun 15, 2026 | “Olivia Rodrigo goes three-for-three on ‘You Seem Pretty Sad For A Girl So In Love’, her introspective depiction of adult relationships.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Julyssa Lopez | 4.5/5 | 90 | Jun 12, 2026 | “The superstar’s third album features even sharper storytelling, even more visceral emotions, and Robert Smith.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Clash | 9/10 | 90 | Jun 12, 2026 | “Olivia Rodrigo has been using her music as a diary since she was seventeen, delving into each pivotal experience in her life with unfiltered honesty.” |
| Consequence | B+ | 88 | “With you seem pretty sad for a girl so in love, Olivia Rodrigo delivers her most mature and emotionally-nuanced album yet.” | |
| Spectrum Culture | 83/100 | 83 | “Olivia Rodrigo’s latest finds the young singer expanding her music to incorporate more cohesive storytelling, and in doing so, is marking herself as someone taking the artistic side of her…” | |
| Pitchfork | 8.3/10 | 83 | Jun 12, 2026 | |
| Beats Per Minute | 82% | 82 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” | |
| The Line of Best Fitby Louis Pelingen | 8/10 | 80 | Jun 14, 2026 | “There’s never a moment where you seem pretty sad for a girl so in love structurally drags or feels out of place, a huge boon that allows Olivia Rodrigo’s transitions…” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 12, 2026 | “Gossips have rushed to the lyrics for details about her personal life, but the rest of us can just get on with luxuriating in Rodrigo’s funny, Cure-infused craft” |
| musicOMH | 4/5 | 80 | “Californian’s third album offers signs of progression and maturity while presenting a musical dissection of a relationship Californian’s third album offers signs of progression and maturity while presenting a musical…” | |
| Slant | 4/5 | 80 | “The sees the singer taking her skillset to a new level.” | |
| Riff Magazine | 8/10 | 80 | “On her third album, Olivia Rodrigo shifts into a more mature perspective, playing out what happens when she gets what she wants.” | |
| Northern Transmissionsby Sam Franzini | 7.5/10 | 75 | Jun 13, 2026 | |
| Exclaim!by Josh Korngut | 7/10 | 70 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love in Olivia Rodrigo's catalog
More from Olivia Rodrigo
More Rock from around 2026
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply