Based on 14 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 90.
By the numbers: The Killers's best-reviewed album here since Sam’s Town (2006). Scores ran from 50 (Clash) to 90 (Spill Magazine).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spill Magazine | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2017 | “The Killers Wonderful Wonderful Island Records Wonderful Wonderful is The Killers’ fifth studio album, and their first in five years (Battle Born was released in 2012) . That does not…” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B | 85 | ||
| Consequence | B | 85 | “The band have rarely sounded so experimental, unencumbered, and mid-tempo.” | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “On 'Wonderful Wonderful' band leader Brandon Flowers bares himself more than ever before. Read NME's review.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Slant via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | “Wonderful Wonderful’s best tracks happen to be the ones that feel the most tossed off by the Killers.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | “Our take on the fifth album from the nostalgia-loving Vegas rockers.” |
| musicOMH | 3.5/5 | 70 | “Over a decade on from the success of their debut album Hot Fuss, The Killers’ fifth album sees them return with legacy on their mind. The idea cropped up” | |
| Pitchfork | 6.3/10 | 63 | “With the Killers, greatness and ridiculousness go hand in hand. Their fifth album contains only a little of both.” | |
| The Independent via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Plus Death From Above – Outrage! Is Now, and Sløtface – Try Not To Freak Out” |
| PopMatters | 6/10 | 60 | “The Killers were in need of redemption.” | |
| Clash | 5/10 | 50 | “You can already picture the stirring title track from The Killers’ fifth record being used as a melodramatic opener for their upcoming arena tour.” |
More from The Killers
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply