Women in Music Pt. III

Haim – Women in Music Pt. III: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Women in Music Pt. III by Haim
Released June 26, 2020
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Haim

Women in Music Pt. III

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 6 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval100%6 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 4 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Haim's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Days Are Gone (79). All 6 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from Slant.

020406080100Rolling Stone Australia: 80XS Noize: 80PopMatters: 80Beats Per Minute: 80Slant: 80Pitchfork: 86 Breakdown 81
The gist
Pitchforkby Aimee Cliff 8.6/10 86 2020 “The third album from the trio is far and away their best. Intimate, multidimensional, and wide-ranging, the songwriting shines with personality and a great curiosity for melody and style.”
Rolling Stone Australiaby Tyler Jenke 4/5 80 2020 “The ladies of the Valley meet ‘Ladies of the Canyon’ on their strongest, wisest album yet”
XS Noizeby Lee Campbell 8/10 80 2020 “Sisterly trio Haim are back with one of the most eagerly anticipated albums of 2020. It has all the California-pop weightlessness of previous releases, but this time, Danielle, Alana and…”
PopMatters 8/10 80 2020 “On Women in Music Pt. III, HAIM are done pretending and ready to be themselves.”
Beats Per Minuteby Tim Sentz 80% 80 2020 “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s”
Slantby Jeremy Winograd 4/5 80 2020 “The album strikes a deft balance between experimental and commercial, moody and uplifting.”

More from Haim

See all Haim albums ranked

More Rock from around 2020

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply