Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 28 to 90.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 28 (Beats Per Minute) to 90 (DIY).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIY | 4.5/5 | 90 | “Where ‘Big Ideas’ laid the groundwork, ‘Mud’ serves to consolidate the ideas;.” | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Chris Dart | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Simon Price | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Any idea that the furore about his homophobic and misogynist lyrics might have chastened him evaporates within the first few seconds of his third album.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Craig Jenkins | 7.8/10 | 78 | 2013 | “Two years after Goblin, the Odd Future ringleader returns with an album heavy on gorgeous beats and a lyrical focus that takes aim at the band's critics and the trappings…” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randall Roberts | 3/4 | 75 | 2013 | “Pop album review: Tyler the Creator's 'Wolf' can be daring, smart” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | “Wolf is not Goblin. At the end of the record, that may be the most important thing one could say about this album. It is for me. Tyler, The Creator's…” | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Simon Vozick-Levinson | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| Slant | 3/5 | 60 | “While Wolf feels like progress on some fronts, it’s also a resolutely conservative effort.” | |
| Spectrum Culture | 2.0/5 | 40 | “[xrr rating=3.75/5]Just as Ice Cube once dominated the fall and Rick Ross set the tone for summer, it seems Odd Future have taken up the duties of setting off the…” | |
| Beats Per Minute | 28% | 28 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Tyler, the Creator
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply