Early reviews. Critics give Barbara an early B-Side Breakdown of 69 (Mixed Bag), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Barbara
3 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Their ‘With Love And Squalor’ album incontestably rocked, but follow-up ‘Brain Thrust Mastery’ dropped the ball somewhat. Adding those superfluous synths made the whole thing too polite, too lacking in…” |
| DIYby Gareth O'Malley | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “A delight from start to finish.” |
| PopMattersby Chris Conaton | 7/10 | 70 | 2010 | “What a difference a drummer makes. A few years back, We Are Scientists released With Love and Squalor, an energy-filled power-pop album with a bevy of catchy” |
| Beats Per Minuteby Rob Hakimian | 62% | 62 | 2010 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | |
| musicOMHby Andrew Burgess | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | “At times We Are Scientists sound as if they could be nerdy, cleaner-cut younger brothers to The Killers. At others they sound like a more polished second” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Barbara in We Are Scientists's catalog
More from We Are Scientists
More Rock from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply