Torture

Cannibal Corpse – Torture: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Torture by Cannibal Corpse
Released March 9, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Cannibal Corpse

Torture

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 6 critics · 83% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval83%5 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 8 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Cannibal Corpse's best-reviewed album here since Evisceration Plague (2009). 5 of 6 critics liked it, with Consequence the lone holdout at 70.

020406080100Consequence: 70Spin: 80AllMusic: 80Louder: 80PopMatters: 80Record Collector: 80 Breakdown 78
The gist
Spinby Kory Grow 8/10 80 2012 “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: March 13, 2012Label: Metal BladeProverbial showers not growers, the death vets continue winning/killing streak of their”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Gregory Heaney 4/5 80
Louder via Wikipedia 4/5 80
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Craig Hayes 8/10 80
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Joel McIver 4/5 80
Consequence via Wikipediaby Alex Young 3.5/5 70

More from Cannibal Corpse

See all Cannibal Corpse albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply