The Seventh Seal

Rakim – The Seventh Seal: B-Side Breakdown 61 (D-) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Seventh Seal by Rakim
Released November 17, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Rakim

The Seventh Seal

61
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 8 critics · 25% approval
B-Side Breakdown61Grade: D-
Approval25%2 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.

By the numbers: Rakim's best-reviewed album here since The Master (1999). Scores ran from 40 (PopMatters) to 80 (RapReviews).

020406080100PopMatters: 40Spin: 50Slant: 50Pitchfork: 56Los Angeles Times: 63AllMusic: 70The A.V. Club: 75RapReviews: 80 Breakdown 61
The gist
RapReviews 8/10 80
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Chris Martins C 75 2009
AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries 3.5/5 70 2006
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 2.5/4 63 “Los Angeles Times blogs that were published between 2006 and 2013.”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Tom Breihan 5.6/10 56 2009 “After 10 years and an aborted Dr. Dre collaboration, the legendary MC releases his comeback album.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Mosi Reeves 2.5/5 50 2009 “It's appropriate for the man most consider the best rapper ever to open his first album in a decade with "How to Emcee." And it's no surprise that Rakim”
Slant 2.5/5 50 “On The Seventh Seal, Rakim finds himself shackled to a mass of middling producers and unexceptional beats.”
PopMatters 4/10 40 “Rakim Allah (who I'll refer to in a number of ways throughout this review) will always be known as one of the best to ever do it. His legacy can…”

More from Rakim

See all Rakim albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply