Early reviews. Critics give The Life of the World to Come an early B-Side Breakdown of 80 (Keeper), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on The Life of the World to Come
6 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 PopMatters
- Lowest 70 Slant and AllMusic
- Career Tied for #4 of The Mountain Goats's 17 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Ian Mathers | 9/10 | 90 | ||
| Robert Christgau via Wikipedia | A- | 85 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mike Powell | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2009 | “John Darnielle offers up a concept album based on Biblical verses, and the theme leads to an intense collection of songs that yields more with every listen.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Lauren Strain | 8/10 | 80 | 2009 | “Each pared track of _Life of the World to Come_, **The Mountain Goats**' 16th – released – album (with vocalist/writer John Darnielle and bassist P…” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jesse Cataldo | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2009 | “The Mountain Goats’s The Life of the World to Come isn’t the sound of John Darnielle finding religion.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2009 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Life of the World to Come in The Mountain Goats's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Mountain Goats
- AllMusic Harsher than usual12 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on The Mountain Goats's other albums (13).
- Pitchfork About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on The Mountain Goats's other albums (15).
- Slant About usual for them12 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on The Mountain Goats's other albums (3).
More from The Mountain Goats
← Earlier Heretic Pride (2008)Later → All Eternals Deck (2011)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply