The Lioness

Jason Molina – The Lioness: B-Side Breakdown 67 (D+) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Lioness by Jason Molina
Released January 17, 2000
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Jason Molina

The Lioness

67
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 5 critics · 40% approval
B-Side Breakdown67Grade: D+
Approval40%2 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 5 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: 2 of 5 critics liked it.

020406080100NME: 50AllMusic: 60Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 60Pitchfork in 2000: 76Pitchfork in 2018: 87 Breakdown 67
The gist
Pitchfork in 2018 via Wikipediaby Sam Sodomsky 8.7/10 87 2018
Pitchfork in 2000 via Wikipediaby Meg Zamula 7.6/10 76 2000 “Until last year, it never occurred to me to name an annual top make-out song. Whether this was due to …”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 3/5 60
NME via Wikipedia 2.5/5 50 “First a question: how many Will Oldhams are there in the world? Just one? Maybe there’s only enough room in this trailer park/barn/log cabin for one William Hague-haired alt-country troubadour…”

More from Jason Molina

See all Jason Molina albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2000

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply