Critics give Damage and Joy a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (C-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.
The verdict on Damage and Joy
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 8 liked it.
- Highest 80 Record Collector and DIY
- Lowest 60 PopMatters and AllMusic
- Career Tied for #6 of The Jesus and Mary Chain's 7 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The Jesus and Mary Chain's best-reviewed album here since Munki (1998).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “The frankly annoying thing about the Reid brothers’ return to music after so many years is the fact they don’t seem to have aged a day, aurally at least.” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Matthew Davies Lombardi | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “These constant provocateurs aren’t losing an icy distance just yet.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | C+ | 78 | 2017 | “A legendary band tread too safely across a vast and beautiful landscape of their own making.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | “Read our take on 'Damage and Joy,' the Jesus and Mary Chain's first album since 1998.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 6.7/10 | 67 | 2017 | “Nineteen years after their last album, the Jesus and Mary Chain pick up where they left off, offering their usual mix of feedback-spiked rockers and stoned ballads.” |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Rachel Brodsky | 6.2/10 | 62 | 2017 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Ian King | 6/10 | 60 | 2017 | “Jim Reid is absolutely right to assert that to make a good record like Damage and Joy “in your 50s, the way we are… is a minor miracle". In another…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 3/5 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The Jesus and Mary Chain
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply