Gold Medal

The Donnas – Gold Medal: B-Side Breakdown 62 (D-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Gold Medal by The Donnas
Released October 25, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Donnas

Gold Medal

62
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 7 critics · 29% approval
B-Side Breakdown62Grade: D-
Approval29%2 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Gold Medal an early B-Side Breakdown of 62 (D-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Gold Medal

Critics split on this one: scores run from 40 (Uncut and 1 other) to 85 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100Uncut: 40The Guardian: 40Pitchfork: 55AllMusic: 60Rolling Stone: 70Stylus Magazine: 81Entertainment Weekly: 85 Breakdown 62
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B 85 2004
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B- 81 2004
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2004
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Johnny Loftus 5.5/10 55 2004 “On their sixth album, The Donnas go for the sometimes dreaded "mature" approach by emphasizing craft, dropping their "Donna" tags in favor of their given names, and extending their track…”
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/10 40
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dorian Lynskey 2/5 40 2004

More from The Donnas

See all The Donnas albums ranked

More Rock from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply