Early reviews. Critics give In Spades an early B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on In Spades
4 of 5 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 Spill Magazine and The Line of Best Fit
- Lowest 70 AllMusic
- Career #2 of The Afghan Whigs's 7 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The Afghan Whigs's best-reviewed album here since Gentlemen (1993).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spill Magazine via Wikipediaby Jason Saunders | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2017 | “The Afghan Whigs In Spades Sub Pop The Afghan Whigs continue to fill the air with their hypnotic and melodically satisfying music as they release their eighth album since 1988…” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Jon Putnam | 9/10 | 90 | 2017 | “Greg Dulli takes us on a trip down the rabbit hole of his subconscious where he grapples with memory, dreams, and fantasy.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Hannah J Davies | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 7.6/10 | 76 | 2017 | “Bolstered again by the louche and ravaged voice of singer Greg Dulli, the latest from the indie rock icons is delightfully stuffed with romance and rancor.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
In Spades in The Afghan Whigs's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Afghan Whigs
- AllMusic Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Afghan Whigs's other albums (6).
More from The Afghan Whigs
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply