Early reviews. Critics give This Is What I Mean an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (Keeper), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on This Is What I Mean
7 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Outlier 100 The Independent, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 77 Pitchfork
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Stormzy's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Gang Signs & Prayer (81). The fifth best-reviewed Hip-Hop & Rap album of 2022 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 5/5 | 100 | 2022 | “Although much of the music is keyboard-based (with Dion Wardle delivering a relaxed elegance), the romance is heightened by unabashed swells of cello, flute, trumpet and a fantastic gospel choir” |
| Rolling Stone UK via Wikipediaby Emmanuel Onapa | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “On the eve of releasing his third album This Is What I Mean, Stormzy shared an emotional message to his fans.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Sam Moore | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “The south Londoner’s contemplative third studio album features his most mellow and mature moments yet” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby James Mellen | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “After nearly a decade in the game, London-born grime heavyweight Stormzy has returned with third studio album ‘This Is What I Mean’. He has described the” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “The rapper is still capable of lyrical swagger, political insight and hugely entertaining flexes but his third LP is a musically subtle trawl through his romantic regrets” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Will Pritchard | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2022 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
This Is What I Mean in Stormzy's catalog
More from Stormzy
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply