Songs from the Big Chair

Tears for Fears – Songs from the Big Chair: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for Songs from the Big Chair by Tears for Fears
Released February 1, 1985
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Tears for Fears

Songs from the Big Chair

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 5 critics · 60% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval60%3 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessContentiousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 46 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 5 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (PopMatters) to 100 (Record Collector).

020406080100PopMatters: 40Los Angeles Times: 50Robert Christgau: 85Pitchfork: 89Record Collector: 100 Breakdown 73
The gist
Record Collectorby Sue Matiz 5/5 100 2014 “Sophomore sets are notoriously tricky beasts. Not so for Tears For Fears, who took a comparatively leisurely 24 months to follow up 1983’s The”
Pitchforkby Tal Rosenberg 8.9/10 89 2017 “Tears for Fears’ second album is the one sound of pop-rock in the ’80s. Its personal psychology, meticulous compositions, and world-sized choruses evoked the loss of control in an overwhelming…”
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau B 85
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Lori E. Pike 2/4 50
PopMatters 4/10 40 2014 “Songs From the Big Chair? The cheap shot would be Songs From People With Big Hair, more like. This album was first released at that surreal moment in the”

More from Tears for Fears

See all Tears for Fears albums ranked

More Rock from around 1985

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply