Sol Invictus

Faith No More – Sol Invictus: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 14 critic reviews.

Album cover for Sol Invictus by Faith No More
Released May 13, 2015
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Faith No More

Sol Invictus

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 14 critics · 64% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval64%9 of 14 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Based on 14 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 95.

By the numbers: Faith No More's best-reviewed album here since Angel Dust (1992). Scores ran from 50 (Slant) to 95 (Dead Rhetoric).

020406080100Slant: 50Pitchfork: 60Rolling Stone: 70PopMatters: 70musicOMH: 70Record Collector: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80Louder Than War: 80Paste: 83Consequence: 85The A.V. Club: 88Distorted Sound: 90Dead Rhetoric: 95 Breakdown 77
The gist
Dead Rhetoric 9.5/10 95 2015
Distorted Sound 9/10 90 “Words: Jessica Howkins Sol Invictus, the first FAITH NO MORE album in 18 years, with high anticipation for the release,”
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jacob Oller B+ 88 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
Consequence via Wikipediaby Collin Brennan B 85 2015
Paste via Wikipediaby Ryan J. Prado 8.3/10 83 2015 “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.”
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz 4/5 80 2015 “It’s been 17 years since San Francisco’s Faith No More released an album, splitting a couple of years afterwards to work on other”
NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly 8/10 80 2015 “You know about the big releases each week, but what about those smaller albums which may have passed underneath your radar. Don’t miss out on the smaller, lesser-known gems which…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming 4/5 80
Louder Than War 8/10 80 “Rock titans, Faith No More, return with their first new long player since 1997. Is this a reunion to be excited about or is it just a watered down version…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow 3.5/5 70 2015 “Check out our album review of Artist's Sol Invictus on Rolling Stone.com.”
PopMatters 7/10 70 “Sol Invictus is an interesting version of the reunion album. Over the past decade, plenty of indie rock and heavy metal bands have returned from long hiatuses”
musicOMH 3.5/5 70 “It’s been nearly 20 years since Faith No More released their last studio album, Album of The Year. Since then, Mike Patton, the man who is arguably the”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zoe Camp 6.0/10 60 2015 “Faith No More are back with their first album in 18 years, and two decades away haven't softened Mike Patton’s coal-black heart. He’s pissed off and proud of it, picking…”
Slant 2.5/5 50 “Absent the lightning-in-a-bottle voltage of their heyday, Faith No More’s Sol Invictus is shockingly no more than adequate.”

More from Faith No More

See all Faith No More albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2015

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply