Social Cues

Cage the Elephant – Social Cues: B-Side Breakdown 68 (D+) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Social Cues by Cage the Elephant
Released April 19, 2019
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Cage the Elephant

Social Cues

68
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 7 critics · 57% approval
B-Side Breakdown68Grade: D+
Approval57%4 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Cage the Elephant's best-reviewed album here since Tell Me I’m Pretty (2015). Scores ran from 40 (DIY) to 81 (Consequence).

020406080100DIY: 40The Line of Best Fit: 45AllMusic: 70Under the Radar: 80NME: 80Rolling Stone: 80Consequence: 81 Breakdown 68
Consequence via Wikipediaby Grant Sharples B- 81 2019
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Matthew Raven 8/10 80
NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell 4/5 80 2019
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke 4/5 80 2019
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 3.5/5 70
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Ben Lynch 4.5/10 45 2019
DIY via Wikipediaby Louisa Dixon 2/5 40 2019

More from Cage the Elephant

See all Cage the Elephant albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2019

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply