Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 88.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Imagine Dragons's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Loom (60). Scores ran from 40 (The Guardian) to 88 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | ||
| XS Noizeby Tillie Elvrum | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “Las Vegas alt-rockers Imagine Dragons are back with Smoke + Mirrors — the follow-up to their double platinum debut album Night Visions.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipedia | D+ | 68 | 2015 | “Alternative in name only, the band’s second full-length is heavy on anthems and light on inspiration.” |
| musicOMHby Christopher Monk | 2/5 | 40 | 2015 | “Imagine Dragons hit serious pay dirt in 2012 with their multi-million-selling debut Night Visions. That album was hard to pigeonhole: not because the Las” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 2/5 | 40 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Smoke + Mirrors on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul Mardles | 2/5 | 40 | 2015 | “The Las Vegas-based quartet stay right in the middle of the road on their second album” |
More from Imagine Dragons
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply